Other manufacturers tend to publish robot data not only on pose repeatability but also pose accuracy and path repeatability/accuracy.
We have 2 UR10, not e-series and are trying to judge how they compare mechanically with the UR10e, e-series. The pose repeatability is specified as 0.05mm for e-series while it’s only 0.1mm for older UR10s, which leads me to believe that they have improved drives, but there is no data available to compare, is there any?